Advanced computing is terrific, but I object to the grandiose and misleading language exemplified by the terms "neural network" and "artificial intelligence" in this context. Computing, increasingly, has given us (e.g., humans) powerful tools for processing data in quantities and at speeds heretofore unimaginable, but it is neither comparable nor a substitute for human cognition. I refer you to Yariv Adnan's superb essay, Do neural networks really work like neurons?
Just because a the structure of a computing process mimics the known structure of a cognitive process, this does not imply that it is comparable.